
We recently had an interesting query from a client of one of our accountancy contacts:
Is there anything to stop me selling my classic car to my limited company?
First of all, why would the client want to do that in the first place?
In this particular case the car in question was a high-end classic car with a value of £1m. It had cost the client £100,000 many years earlier.
The main motivations for the client were:
Sounds too good to be true?…
The main stumbling block here are the benefit-in-kind (BIK) rules relating to company cars.
A BIK arises where a car or van is made available to an employee or a member of the employee’s family (s.114 ITEPA 2003).
On the issue of whether a car is “made available”, HMRC adopt a hard line. To illustrate this point, HMRC do not accept that a car is not available in the following scenarios:
Note also that it is only necessary for a car to be “available” for a BIK to arise. Even if the car is not actually used a BIK will still arise.
The normal computational rules for car benefit, based on list price and CO2 emissions do not apply to classic cars. If they did, the taxable benefit on a high value car would be negligible, so not surprisingly HMRC introduced different computational rules.
Cars registered before 1 January 1998 do not have a CO2 emissions figure, so the car benefit is calculated by reference to the market value of the car multiplied by the ‘appropriate percentage’ based on the engine size. The percentages are:
0 -1,400 cc 24%
1,401 – 2,000 cc 35%
Over 2,000 cc 37%
The fair market value is £1m and in this case the car was over 2,000 cc, so if HMRC were to successfully argue that the car was ‘available’ and therefore a BIK arose the annual BIK would be:
£1,000,000 x 37% = £370,000
This would obviously be taxed at rates of 40%/45% depending on the client’s other income, so it would probably result in an annual income tax charge of £220,000 per annum. This would of course negate the benefit of the initial tax-free gain and it would obviously not make sense to proceed with the transaction in these circumstances.
To avoid the BIK rules the client would have to convince HMRC that the car was not “available”.
We therefore submitted a Non-Statutory Clearance seeking confirmation that the BIK rules would not apply.
There was an exchange of letters with HMRC and HMRC’s initial stance was that simply having Board Minutes prohibiting private use was not sufficient to show it was not “available” since it was the director and spouse’s company. Similarly keeping the vehicle on company premises, accessible to the director, also didn’t mean the car wasn’t available.
In this case the holding company purchased the car, so it was one of several investments held by the company. The only thing to watch out for in the future is the level of investment activity. In the future it may be that the level of investments held mean that the overall group becomes an investment company group rather than a trading company group, which might affect the availability of other tax reliefs relating to capital gains tax and inheritance tax.
Our team at ETC Tax have extensive knowledge of both capital gains tax and inheritance tax. It’s essential to have the right advice when dealing with these tax matters as getting the correct advice is crucial. If you have any questions or need information on the above, feel free to get in touch.


