Back in 2020 Father Christmas (“FC”) phoned the ETC offices for the first time.
Like many clients, he had some tough tax issues to contend with.
Importantly, during COVID, FC had got stuck in the UK and was living with his brother, Farmer Christmas (to revisit this call click here )
You see, he had become UK resident as he had exceeded his ‘unexpected reasons’ exception.
Today, on a cold and dark morning in Altrincham, the phone rang again and old St Nick is on the phone with an update and more questions.
In the main, he’s been enjoying his new life in Rutland, as opposed to Lapland, and has bucked the UK anti-growth trend and had started building his business in the UK.
However, his happiness seems to be waning under the current government having now “had enough of those reds in Downing Street”. As we will see, he also seems to be having some ongoing tax problems, which might be feeding this narrative as well. We pick up the conversation here.
ETC: (laughing) Thought you liked ‘red’ FC.
FC: Well, sartorially, yes. But politically? Absolutely not. In fact, I’m thinking of moving to Dubai.
ETC: Oh, that’s interesting.
FC: Yes, I’m very well connected there in the highest circles. You see, I’m great friends with Sheikh Bin Stevens [yes, this entire tale has been drafted to accommodate this Christmas cracker-level joke].
ETC: ‘Is Dubai not a bit too bling’ for you FC?
FC: Dear girl, a man who likes a bauble as much as me is right at home in Dubai.
ETC: So, what do I owe the pleasure of this call, FC?
FC: Well, you see, I’ve just got into TikTok. All the elves love it. It’s terrible for productivity and drives me mad. But I now love a good scroll… and I find I get some excellent tax advice…
ETC: Hmmmm…
FC: I see you’re not convinced, dear girl. Well, only last week, one enterprising young man told me how it’s possible to avoid tax by setting up a tax-free company in Dubai. All I have to do is carry out my work from Rutland, and invoice from the new overseas business. Profits. Decanted. Like a fine Christmas port.
ETC: Errr?
FC: After all, it’s what Google do, right? So, all I have to do is buy an off-the-shelf company… or should that be an ‘off the elf on the shelf company’ (just my little Christmas offshore joke, dear girl, you’re far too serious) and appoint a nominee director to do my bidding.
ETC: I do apologise for being too serious. It’s an occupational hazard.
FC: Apology festively accepted!
ETC: But does your man on TikTok have any qualifications?
FC: Well, he’s more of a boy than a man. And no, he goes to great lengths to say ‘this is not financial advice’ and ‘do your research’. He’s very smart, you see.
ETC: OK. First of all, you need directors that are actually resident in Dubai, and who are able to exercise proper management and control from there.
FC: Exercise? Hmmm. I’m not too sure about that (FC pats his belly). Let me call you back.
[CLICK – Santa hangs up!]
…
Santa calls again.
FC: Ok, I’ve had a quick Teams call with potential offshore directors. They understand. They know ‘which side their bread is buttered’ so will do what I want. Hmmm, bread and butter pudding (muses FC).
FC: (Snapping back into the present) I did have one other concern.
The ETC tax adviser perks up a bit.
FC: And that was that they might run off with my brass. However, they did tell me that they deal with much bigger fish than me… and I’m a pretty big fish… so they said they’re hardly going to do a runner, are they?
ETC: Ok, that’s good, FC. But where are the elves these days?
FC: Well, we had to move them to Rutland under the little-known UK Ear 1 Investor Visa. It’s a bit hot for them and they have to sit, all year round, in the air con. But I find it does make them more productive… if a little miserable.
ETC: The problem is, then, FC, it still seems that you would very much still be classed as trading in the UK… and taxable.
FC: (He gulps hard) Well, you are giving me lots of problems and very few solutions. What can I do?
Well, as ETC explains, it’s not going to be easy.
ETC: Firstly, you’ll have to make sure you aren’t trading in the UK. Secondly, you’ll have to make sure that you don’t have a permanent establishment (or ‘PE’, for short) in the UK.
FC: So, I need to sort those elves out?
ETC: Well, yes, I guess so.
FC: It all sounds much more complicated than my TikTok friend suggested.
ETC: Indeed.
Tentatively, our ETC adviser goes on.
ETC: Have you heard of the transfer of assets abroad?
FC: What, like my sack of presents?
ETC: No, no.
FC: But my present sack transfers assets abroad?
ETC: No, not quite. I’m talking about the personal tax anti-avoidance rules…
FC: I’m not going to like this, am I?
ETC: Put simply, if you remain a UK-resident shareholder and there is no commercial reason for setting up the company overseas, then HMRC can effectively ‘look through’ the company and tax you, as the shareholder, on the profits.
FC: Blimey. But how will anybody find out!?
The ETC adviser looks weary, as if she’d been asked this question thousands of times before.
She begins to tell him about HMRC’s scary new data-gathering capability that links together many different data sources and whatever useful or incriminating snippets it can find on the internet.
FC gulps and immediately begins to regret his Instagram story documenting his trip to Dubai entitled ‘Sticking it to the taxman’. He’d never bothered to tick the privacy settings.
Sensing the troubling atmosphere, our ETC adviser decides to move the conversation on.
ETC: Let’s leave that for now and we can have a think. But, anyway, tell me how you’ve been getting on since our last conversation?
It has to be said that this was a slightly barbed comment as, following the last conversation, FC had decided to appoint other advisers to ‘solve’ problems / access opportunities explained by ETC back in 2020. However, like his faith in his favourite TikTok adviser, things hadn’t quite panned out too well.
FC: Yes, where do we start?
ETC: Well, I don’t know, how about the R&D claim?
FC: (Sighs) Well, as you know, we researched and created a brand-new hydrogen-powered sleigh. Zero emissions. You know, to counter the methane production from all those carrots that the kids leave out for the reindeers that are sprinkled in glitter… And let me tell you this, if you had a second home on a glacier, you’d be worried about climate change, too.
ETC: Oh yes. We proposed a full report on this. We told you that, if successful, as you weren’t turning a profit, you could have surrendered the loss to HMRC… at the time that was worth 14.5% of the amount.
FC: Yes, that’s the one.
ETC: …and I remember, you wanted the funds before Christmas and we couldn’t guarantee that. So, you went elsewhere?
FC: Errr. Yeah. In the end, we made our claim with an R&D claims company called Green Jinglefish. It had the strapline, “If you don’t ask, you don’t get”.
FC: (continues) Sadly, they also made a claim for the special fridge the elves use to cool down in. And when I say ‘special’ I mean a Beko fridge from Argos. I was also a bit wary when they started claiming for a project on elf nutrition. Basically, they just eat candy sticks and gingerbread… like they’ve done for millennia.
FC: What Green Jinglefish didn’t tell me was that I would get an investigation from HMRC… and then the company would do a runner. Can you assist me with that please?
ETC: Yes, sure. We’d be happy to help with the enquiry.
FC: Good. One other thing.
ETC: Yes…
FC: Do you remember that I was looking at whether the business could provide me with that new sleigh? And the wise old elf had told me that I might have a ‘Benefit of being Kind’ on it.
ETC: Hmmmmm. Again, I think you’ve got the wrong end of the candy stick there, FC. As I told you at the time, a benefit in kind is where an employer provides you with something – say, the use of an asset – free of charge or at an undervalue, and thecash equivalent of that ‘benefit’ is subject to tax.
FC: But that doesn’t sound like something nice at all!
ETC: Indeed, but as I said at the time, were it a zero-emission car, then there would be no benefit in kind (although it’s not quite as attractive now)… and the company could have written off the purchase in the first year.
FC: Yes, yes. We tried to argue that the sleigh was a car.
ETC: We?
FC: Well, I did.
ETC: But it’s not a car, is it? Do you remember what I told you a car was, FC?
FC: Yes (you can hear FC rolling his eyes). A… mechanically… propelled… road vehicle.
ETC: And what was your response?
FC: Well, I think I was rather clever, to be honest. The new sleigh was mechanically propelled… and it could go on a road… weather permitting.
ETC: Snow permitting?
FC: Well, yes.
ETC: As I said at the time, it was a fairly bullish view. What happened?
FC: Well (rather embarrassed) we got an enquiry. Can you help?
ETC: Of course we can.
ETC: Oh, I almost forgot to ask. How did Rudolph get along with his Spanish image rights investigation?
FC: Well, let me tell you. It was a pretty close call. In the end, he used the same lawyer as Carlo Ancelotti. Same result. Suspended jail sentence. He’s not been the same since. All the colour has drained from his nose. But he’s a free reindeer with a criminal record.
ETC: Good, good. Oh, one final thing, FC. You’ll need to satisfy our Anti-Money Laundering checks before we can engage you.
ETC: I think we might need to do some enhanced checks on you.
FC: What!?
ETC: Well, from what I can see, you procure items for the entire world’s children… and I’m not clear on the source of the funds… and then you then simply give them away. This seems an unusual pattern of transactions to me.
FC: Unusual? I represent the spirit of good cheer at Christmas. I bring peace, joy… good food… and wine.
ETC: Of course you do. But I can’t see any exemption in The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 for any of those things… Also, worryingly, you seem to have a number of different names – Father Christmas, Santa Claus, Old Saint Nick, Weihnachtsmann, Papa Noel, Babbo Natale…
FC: That’s not my fault. I am the personification of the most wonderful time of the year. Why does it matter what they call me in different countries?
ETC: I know, I know. We just have to do our due diligence on all our clients. Look on the bright side… I don’t think you’re a Politically Exposed Person.
FC: Well, that is a relief?! Please send me what you need. I need to go. It’s time for the Christmas work do. Merry Christmas. Let’s crack on. Or should that be ‘cracker-on!’
Expanding into EU markets can be overwhelming, with each country labelled by a different VAT regime, import rule, or acronym, it gets extremely confusing.
Since Brexit, UK businesses regularly ask us the same questions:
Do I need to register for VAT in Europe?
What is the IOSS
Will OSS apply to me?
Why does every country seem to have a different VAT rate?
This Q&A guide breaks down the main issues to consider when a UK business starts selling goods into the EU.
Q&A Guide
Q
When I export goods from the UK, are my sales automatically zero-rated?
A
Not automatically. The supply is normally zero-rated, but only if you hold proof that the goods physically left the UK.
You must keep:
A valid EORI number
Commercial documents describing the goods
Transport documents showing the goods left the UK
Records for six years
Exporters have three months to collect all evidence. If the proof isn’t gathered in time, the sale becomes standard-rated for UK VAT purposes.
Top tip: Treat export evidence like CIS or AML documentation, monitored proactively, not after the fact.
You file one monthly IOSS return for all EU countries
Avoids multiple VAT registrations
Ideal for low-value online sales
OSS – One Stop Shop
OSS mainly applies to EU-to-EU movements and services.
For UK exporters of goods, OSS is usually not relevant.
Q
Do different VAT rates across the EU affect my pricing?
A
Yes, significantly. Each EU country sets its own VAT rate.
Examples:
Sweden: 25%
Belgium: 21%
Ireland: 23%
Luxembourg: 17%
If you charge one EU-wide retail price, your margins will change country by country.
Top tip: Adjust pricing or margin models, especially when using IOSS.
Q
How do VAT rules change when selling through online marketplaces (Amazon, eBay, Etsy, Vinted)?
A
If goods are sold through a platform and each consignment is under €150:
The platform accounts for the VAT
You make a zero-rated supply to the platform
You do not need an EU VAT registration for that sale
Exception:
If you store goods in an EU warehouse (e.g., Amazon FBA in Germany, Poland, Czech Republic):
You must register for VAT in the storage country, regardless of value or customer type.
Q
What are the key principles UK businesses must understand before selling goods to the EU?
A
Zero-rating requires solid export evidence
The importer of record determines EU VAT obligations
IOSS is often the best solution for sub-€150 B2C orders
EU VAT rates vary, plan pricing accordingly
Storing goods in the EU triggers an immediate VAT registration
NI follows different EU-aligned rules
OSS and IOSS are entirely different schemes
Conclusion
Selling goods into the EU is viable, with the right structure in place. Most issues arise when UK businesses assume EU VAT works like UK VAT, or that import taxes will be handled by someone else. Clarity on export evidence, the importer of record, VAT rates, and the benefits of IOSS can prevent expensive mistakes and reduce firefighting later.
Next Steps
If you or your client have any VAT related queries please get in touch.
The things that you and your clients REALLY need to know
Immediately after the Budget, you will have been inundated with budget ‘instant’ reactions, rapid-fire summaries and social media posts.
However, at ETC Tax, we like to take a little extra time to get our Budget content out to you to ensure it is as useful as possible.
With that in mind, below are the parts of the Budget that we think will matter most to our network of professional advisers and their and our clients.
If you or your clients have a property rental portfolio.
Unfortunately, landlords have taken another ‘hit’ in the Budget with tax rates on rental income to rise by 2% from 2027–28, and dividend tax rates also increasing by 2% for basic, higher and additional-rate taxpayers from 2026–27.
This means that whether you hold property personally (as a sole trader or in partnership) or through a company (and take income by way of dividends), you will feel the impact.
For some landlords, incorporation may still make sense, especially where borrowing is high, profits are retained, or you’re building a long-term property portfolio, but the gap has narrowed and the benefits are now far more marginal.
If you’re unsure whether to stay as you are or restructure, we can help you understand the impact on your numbers both before and after the new rates take effect. We can model the figures, compare structures and give you a clear view on what is most tax-efficient for you.
Incorporation is not right for everyone, and given that HMRC also announced at the budget that those relying on incorporation relief will now need to formally claim it on their Self-Assessment tax return for the year of transfer (including details of the transaction, tax computations and the nature of the business transferred) as part of wider anti-avoidance measures, if you are considering incorporation, it is now even more important to take specialist tax advice. We can help. Click here to view our property tax section on our web.
If you or your clients are concerned about your inheritance tax position
Transferable £1m allowance
As announced in last year’s Budget, from 6 April 2026, a new £1 million allowance will apply to the combined value of property in an estate qualifying for 100% Business Property Relief or 100% Agricultural Property Relief. Any qualifying relievable property over £1 million will receive tax relief at 50%.
It was originally proposed that the £1m allowance could not be transferred between spouses. However, this year’s Budget now amends this so that any unused amount of the £1 million allowance can be transferred to a surviving spouse or civil partner from 6 April 2026. If the first death was before 6 April 2026, it will be assumed the entirety of the £1 million allowance will be available for transfer to the surviving spouse or civil partner.
In addition, the option to pay Inheritance Tax by equal annual instalments over 10 years interest-free will also be extended to all property which is eligible for agricultural property relief or business property relief. This will be particularly helpful to those estates that are “asset rich, cash poor”.
IHT due on pension funds
At Autumn Budget 2024, it was announced that personal pension funds would be subject to IHT from 6 April 2027.
It was originally proposed that pension scheme administrators would be liable for reporting and paying any Inheritance Tax on the pension element of an individual’s estate. However, following consultation, this year’s budget announced that personal representatives, rather than pension scheme administrators, will be liable for reporting and paying any Inheritance Tax due on unused pension funds and pension death benefits from 6 April 2027. It also confirmed that death in service benefits payable from a registered pension scheme will remain outside the of scope of Inheritance Tax which is welcome news.
Further freezing of IHT rate bands and reliefs
The Nil Rate Band of £325,000 has been fixed at £325,000 since 2009/10. It will now remain at that rate until 2030/31.
Similarly, the Residence Nil Rate Band (RNRB) will remain at £175,000 until 2030/31.
The £175,000 RNRB is available to those passing on a qualifying residence on death to their direct descendants. A taper reduces the amount of the RNRB by £1 for every £2 that the net value of the estate is more than £2 million. This limit is also frozen until 2030/31.
The government announced at Autumn Budget 2024 that the new £1 million allowance will apply to the combined value of property in an estate qualifying for the 100% rate of APR or BPR. This limit has also been frozen until 2030/31.
IHT anti-avoidance
Previously, individuals who are not long-term UK residents could avoid IHT by placing business/agricultural property in offshore structures. As these would not be UK-situs assets, no IHT would be due.
Legislation will be introduced which will allow HMRC to look-through non-UK companies or similar bodies to treat UK agricultural land and buildings as situated in the UK for IHT purposes. This will be effective from 6 April 2026 but will apply to any transfers of value from Budget day (26 November 2025).
This follows the existing treatment for UK residential property for IHT introduced from 6 April 2017.
There will be some transitional relief for trusts in existence as at 30 October 2024 with IHT charges capped at £5m per trust.
Finally, in line with other taxes, IHT charity exemption will be restricted to gifts made directly to UK charities and community amateur sports clubs. Gifts to trusts which do not meet the required charity or club definition will not be exempted as they may not have UK jurisdiction or be regulated.
What’s next?
We recognise that inheritance tax is something a lot of our clients feel passionately about, and at ETC Tax we have extensive experience helping clients structure their affairs to allow them to pass on as much of their wealth to their families as they can within the remit of what is possible.
If you or your clients would like advice on IHT, estate and succession planning matters whether relating to personal or business wealth and whether your assets are held in the UK or overseas, please do get in touch and we would be happy to help – click here to view our IHT section on our website.
If you or your clients have cryptoassets
Whilst the Autumn Budget did not alter how crypto gains are taxed, there were changes to the reporting framework for crypto assets.
The UK has now implemented the OECD’s Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) and aligned it with the existing requirements for Reporting Cryptoasset Service Providers (RCASPs). RCASPs are exchanges or platforms that facilitate the trading or management of cryptoassets such as Binance and Kraken.
Under the updated rules, which take effect 1st January 2026, RCASPs must gather information not only on customers who live outside the UK, as they currently do, but also on UK-resident users. This information will be exchanged automatically between jurisdictions. As a result, HMRC will receive annual CARF data covering all UK taxpayers who use either UK-based or overseas RCASPs. With estimates suggesting 12% of UK adults own some form of crypto assets, and some of those no doubt using overseas RCASPs, there is no doubt that that the new reporting standards will uncover some non-disclosed crypto activity.
This information is designed to provide HMRC with consistent, structured data to strengthen compliance work, address tax avoidance, and help ensure taxpayers meet their reporting obligations.
With HMRC gaining access to much more detailed information, keeping your crypto records accurate and up to date is more important than ever. If you require support with bringing your crypto position up to date, historic disclosure of your crypto activity, and/or in year reporting, please contact us. Click here to view the crypto section on our webiste.
If you or your clients are moving overseas
Post-departure profits
The government is abolishing the long-standing “post-departure trade profits” exception. As a result, any dividends or distributions taken from a close company while an individual is temporarily non-resident will become taxable on their return to the UK, irrespective of whether the underlying profits arose after departure or not.
Under current rules, UK-resident individuals who leave the UK but return within five years may be taxed on income such as capital gains realised while abroad. However, distributions from close companies have historically fallen outside this where they relate to post-departure profits.
From 6 April 2026, this distinction disappears.
The revised rules provide that:
The timing and origin of the profits no longer matter.
All dividends taken while temporarily non-resident will be subject to UK tax upon return.
Anyone returning within five years is likely to fall within the scope of the charge.
Example
A UK-resident director relocates to Dubai in 2023 and remains non-resident for three years. During that period, they withdraw £300,000 of dividends from their UK close company. Under the current framework, it may be argued that the dividends relate to post-departure profits and should not be taxed in the UK.
However, if the individual returns to the UK in August 2026 and within the five-year temporary non-residence period, the full £300,000 will be taxable. The origin of the profits becomes irrelevant. Any foreign tax may provide limited relief, but the UK tax charge will still apply.
Abolition of the dividend tax credit for non-UK residents
Non-UK residents who receive UK dividends and also have UK rental income or partnership income currently benefit from a notional tax credit at the ordinary dividend rate, often reducing or eliminating a UK liability.
From 6 April 2026, this credit is abolished. Non-residents will instead need to choose between:
Being taxed on all UK income and claiming a Personal Allowance, with dividends taxed at normal UK dividend rates; or
Being taxed only on UK rental/partnership income, but without a Personal Allowance.
From 6 April 2026, employers applying in-year PAYE relief for non-UK resident employees with mixed UK and overseas duties will be subject to a new 30% cap on the proportion of pay that can be excluded under a PAYE direction.
Historically, this 30% limit applied only when an employee made an OWR claim through Self- Assessment.
This change ensures that in-year PAYE exclusions align with the maximum relief available via a tax return, reducing the risk of underpaid tax. Previously, employers often excluded a larger share based on anticipated overseas work.
Example
An employee earns £120,000 while performing duties both in the UK and overseas. Historically, an employer might have excluded 50–60% from PAYE. From 6 April 2026, only 30% (£36,000) may be excluded. The remainder will be subject to PAYE in the normal way.
What’s next?
We are receiving more and more enquiries from clients looking to leave the UK, and have helped many clients successfully navigate this change. If you need help with any matters relating to relocating overseas (whether individual or corporate) please get in touch.
If you or your clients are subject to the loan charge
As you may be aware, the government commissioned an independent review of the loan charge in January 2025, and the findings of that have now been published resulting in the government accepting all but one of the recommendations. As such, HMRC will now implement a new settlement opportunity for those affected by the loan charge, who have not yet agreed a settlement with HMRC.
This settlement is designed to substantially reduce tax liabilities, particularly for those on lower incomes.
Key features of the new settlement opportunity include:
Tax liabilities recalculated using the tax rates in place when loans were made, rather than 2018/19 rates;
Reductions to reflect historic promoter fees i.e if you paid promoter fees as part of your loan scheme agreement, the amount you paid per year can be used to reduce your tax liability, subject to a cap of £10,000 per year;
A flat write-off of the first £5,000 of tax due per person, applied to the recalculated amount, to provide additional help for those on lower incomes;
No late payment interest will be charged on the re-calculated liability;
Any inheritance tax linked to loan scheme use is to be written off;
Flexible payment arrangements tailored to an individual’s ability to pay, with an automatic option to spread payments over five years (though forward interest will apply).
Although these appear to be some positive changes, this does come with the caveat that no re-calculated liability can be reduced by any more than £70,000. However, the government suggests that most individuals (80%) will not be restricted by this cap as most liabilities appear to be lower than this.
Points of caution
It’s important to be aware that HMRC has not yet clarified how it will distinguish loan schemes from other disguised remuneration arrangements. Some taxpayers have already been told their cases fall outside the scope of the review, so you should not assume that you will automatically qualify for the opportunity. While the new settlement terms may offer significant reductions, the outcome will depend on HMRC’s assessment of your individual circumstances.
What next?
HMRC has previously written to those taxpayers who may be affected during the review process, and from January 2026, your named HMRC contact will confirm you whether your arrangements fall within the scope of the new settlement terms. If so, you should receive an invitation to settle at a reduced amount.
Alternatively, you can register your interest in settling under the new terms by contacting HMRC immediately.
If you have not yet settled your loan charge liability, this settlement opportunity could help reduce what you owe.
We can help you understand how the new terms apply to your position, check your figures and support you in preparing the information HMRC will need – if you need assistance, please contact us.
Other things you should be aware of:
Changes to Corporation Tax Penalties
The proposed legislation doubles the current penalty levels for late filing of Corporation Tax returns. Under the revised regime, the penalties will be:
£200 for a late return
£400 where the return is more than three months late
£1,000 for three consecutive late filings
£2,000 for three consecutive filings more than three months late
This represents a significant tightening of the penalty framework and reinforces the importance of timely compliance.
EMI – Increased Limits from 6 April 2026
For EMI options granted on or after 6 April 2026, the qualifying limits will be substantially increased:
The company-wide limit on unexercised options will rise from £3 million to £6 million.
The gross assets test will increase from £30 million to £120 million.
The employee limit will rise from 250 to 500 employees.
These changes are designed to enable larger scale-ups, as well as early-stage companies, to use EMI to attract, retain and reward key employees more effectively.
EIS and VCT Reforms
The government is increasing several thresholds within the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) and Venture Capital Trust (VCT) regimes to enhance support for early-stage and growing companies. The key changes include:
Increasing the gross assets limit for EIS and VCT eligibility to £30 million (previously £15 million) immediately before the share issue, and to £35 million (previously £16 million) immediately after.
Raising the annual investment cap to £10 million (from £5 million) for standard companies, and to £20 million (from £10 million) for knowledge-intensive companies.
Doubling the lifetime investment limit to £24 million (from £12 million), and to £40 million (from £20 million) for knowledge-intensive companies.
Reducing the rate of Income Tax relief for VCT investors from 30% to 20%.
These measures widen access to growth capital while repositioning the reliefs available to investors.
ATED – out-of-time relief claims
As a reminder, the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED) applies when all three of the following conditions are met:
A “non-natural person” owns the property i.e. a company or collective investment vehicle
The property is a UK residential dwelling
The property is worth more than £500,000
However, some companies don’t actually have to pay ATED, because they qualify for a relief, such as lettings relief or property development relief.
However, previously, ATED relief had to be claimed within a strict statutory deadline (12 months following the chargeable period), using the normal ATED return or amendment process. Missed claims meant a full ATED charges applied.
This strict out-of-time limit for relief claims is removed, and a valid claim to reduce the ATED charge may be submitted at any date, although late filing penalties will apply as they always have.
Reduced CGT relief on disposals to Employee Ownership Trusts (EOTs)
Previously, individuals or trustees disposing of shares to a qualifying Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) could claim 100% CGT relief, meaning no Capital Gains Tax was payable if the conditions were met.
From 26 November 2025 relief is reduced from 100% to 50% for disposals on or after that date, meaning 50% of the gain is immediately taxable; but the remaining 50% is deferred.
Other CGT reliefs (e.g., Business Asset Disposal Relief) cannot be claimed on the same disposal.
Please do get in touch to discuss any aspect of this budget document and/or for specialist help with any other tax matters.
Our retail client issued vouchers for redemption in-store.
Issue
The client did not keep a proper record of redemption the risk was that the client accounted for more VAT than they needed!
How we solved it
We examined the voucher issuance and redemption process and helped the client pinpoint transactions where no VAT adjustment had been made, even though a voucher had been redeemed (so the full price was not ultimately paid).
The Outcome
As a result the client made a claim to HMRC for a refund of the VAT that they had overpaid.
This tax relief allows individuals to pass on certain business assets to their heirs or beneficiaries without incurring inheritance tax.
As the 6 April deadline approaches next year, uncertainty around BPR and trust planning is at an all-time high. This Q&A breaks down the most common concerns, providing clarity on what can still be done before the changes take effect and where specialist advice may be essential.
Q
Do I have to use all my BPR at once?
A
No. You can transfer only part of a business or business property. BPR is not an “allowance” — it applies to whatever you transfer, whether all or part.
Q
If I transfer business assets into a trust before 6 April, will BPR apply immediately?
A
Usually yes — provided:
you’ve owned the assets for two years, and
they qualify as relevant business property.
This can reduce the taxable value of the transfer to zero, avoiding the 20% lifetime IHT charge.
Q
Will transferring to a trust restart the two-year ownership clock?
A
No, not normally.
The trust can inherit your original ownership period if the business interest remains essentially the same.
However, if you transfer different assets or restructure significantly, the clock may restart.
Q
Will a transfer into a trust trigger immediate inheritance tax?
A
It can, but not if BPR reduces the value to zero.
If the business doesn’t qualify or only qualifies for 50% BPR, there may still be a charge.
Q
Do I need to complete the transfer before 6 April?
A
Not for BPR itself, but yes if:
you want the transfer to count as part of this tax year,
you are planning multiple trust entries over tax years,
you want the transfer done before potential rule changes or budget updates.
Q
Does BPR apply differently for a gift to children versus a trust?
A
No.
The type of transfer doesn’t affect whether BPR applies.
But the IHT treatment (PET vs. CLT) does differ.
Q
Will I lose BPR if the business is sold soon after I put it into trust?
A
Yes.
If the trustees sell the business, the trust may lose BPR and become exposed to IHT charges later.
Q
Can I put business property into more than one trust and still get BPR?
A
Yes, as long as each transfer qualifies at the time.
However, creating multiple trusts may impact:
trust reporting
10-year charges
effective nil-rate band allocation
Q
Does the business need to be valued before 6 April?
A
Yes, if:
you’re transferring before year end, or
you need evidence for HMRC.
A realistic valuation helps avoid disputes.
Q
Does CGT apply when transferring to a trust?
A
It can, but Hold-Over Relief is usually available for BPR-qualifying business assets.
This avoids immediate CGT.
Q
Do I still need to worry about the seven-year rule?
A
Yes.
A transfer into a trust is a CLT, not a PET.
The CLT limit is £325,000 per individual and refreshes every seven years.
Q
What happens if I don’t act before 6 April?
A
Nothing dramatic, BPR remains available, but tax-year planning opportunities might be lost. Currently 100% of all the value of relevant business property qualifies for relief. From 6 April 2026 this is capped at £1m per individual, with any excess only attracting 50% relief.
Take a look at our handy check list : BPR & Trust Planning Before 6 April
Confirm Eligibility for BPR
Ensure the asset qualifies as “relevant business property.”
Check the business is predominantly trading, not investment-based.
Confirm the asset has been owned for at least two years.
Decide the Type of Transfer
Gift to an individual (PET)
Transfer into a trust (CLT)
Sale or restructuring of business interests
Decide whether the transfer needs to be completed before 6 April for tax-year planning.
Assess Inheritance Tax Implications
Will the transfer create an immediate lifetime IHT charge?
Confirm whether BPR reduces the transfer value to £0, avoiding the 20% CLT charge.
Consider the impact on the nil-rate band.
Consider Capital Gains Tax (CGT)
Determine whether Hold-Over Relief is available.
If the transfer is before year-end, check if CGT planning is needed for this tax year.
Check Whether Timing Affects Relief
Confirm that BPR will still apply at the date of the transfer, not just at death.
Ensure any trust transfers are completed before 6 April if that timing is strategically beneficial.
Understand the Effect of Using BPR
Decide how much BPR-qualifying property to transfer (you do not need to use it all at once).
Check whether multiple trusts are intended and whether this affects the 10-year trust charge later.
Confirm Business Structure Issues
Has the business changed recently (e.g., trading levels, assets sold)?
Will the business be sold soon → does that create a risk of losing BPR?
Ensure corporate documents allow the transfer (company articles, shareholder agreements).
Get a Reliable Valuation
Ensure the valuation is up-to-date and supportable if HMRC reviews it.
Valuation may affect IHT on CLTs and future trust charges.